The post Coinbase Vs SEC: Judge Failla Slams SEC Over Crypto Definitions, Praises DeFi’s Clarity appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

In a landmark hearing, Judge Katherine Polk Failla recently scrutinized the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) position in its legal battle against Coinbase. The case, which has gained attention from both the crypto community and regulatory bodies, saw Judge Failla challenging the SEC’s interpretation of crypto assets and highlighting the clarity provided by the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector.

SEC’s Interpretation Of Howey Under Fire

During the hearing, Judge Failla’s remarks indicated a critical approach toward the SEC’s arguments, particularly concerning the definition and treatment of digital assets. The judge pointed out that the DeFi community’s amicus brief offered a clearer explanation of staking and wallet usage compared to the Commission’s briefing. This acknowledgment of DeFi’s contribution shows a growing recognition of the sector’s role in the ongoing lawsuit.

One of the central issues under debate was the application of the Howey Test, a legal standard used to determine whether certain transactions qualify as investment contracts and thus, are subject to securities laws. Judge Failla noted that the SEC had not provided a counter narrative for the legal foundations of the Howey Test in its briefing, raising questions about the Commission’s approach to crypto assets.

The SEC’s stance that placing tokens on Coinbase’s platform could classify them as securities transactions was met with skepticism by Judge Failla, who pointed out the circular nature of this argument. Moreover, the SEC admitted that it did not allege potential conflicts of interest related to the combination of exchange, clearing, and brokerage services in its complaint against Coinbase.

Court Questions SEC About Bitcoin’s Status

A notable moment occurred when Judge Failla questioned the SEC lawyer about Bitcoin’s status as a currency. The SEC’s avoidance of a direct answer and emphasis on the unique ecosystems of other tokens sparked further inquiry from the judge.

Judge Failla’s critical stance became evident when she interrupted the SEC lawyer’s characterization of tokens as mere computer code, aligning more closely with Coinbase’s perspective. She highlighted the SEC’s inconsistency by referencing former SEC official Bill Hinman’s statement that a token in itself is not a security, contrasting it with the SEC’s current position.

The judge demanded clarity from the SEC, asking them to delineate their concerns and to distinguish between managerial and ministerial roles as they relate to Coinbase’s operations.

Judge Failla pressed the SEC to explain what precisely about Coinbase’s actions was problematic. The SEC’s response hinged on the application of the Howey test to staking. They acknowledged that Coinbase’s view of staking as a complex and costly process was correct. However, the SEC argued that despite appearing ministerial, these activities were managerial in nature, which brings them into the ambit of the Howey test.

Last year, the SEC charged Coinbase for trading unregistered securities and operating illegally, part of its broader crackdown on crypto. Coinbase disputes this, seeking dismissal based on a favorable Ripple Labs ruling, while the SEC cites a different Terraform Labs case to justify its stance.